Quote:
Originally Posted by AusTexShaver
what about the size of the stones?
I read a lot of posts about all the problems people are having and I wonder how much of the trouble is being caused by the size of the stones they are using.
In the old days a normal razor hone was maybe 2 inches wide at the most. Today most people are starting out on a 8x3 Norton. I believe this coupled with most new razors being made today not being as straight and level as they should be are causing these problems.
|
I have to say- I think we put more thought than necessary into these things once we really "get into it". Hone size may or may not affect your honing in terms of technique and stroke but will not make you a better honer depending on the size of the stone. We can work with what is available and make due just fine. Back when straights were the only option I do not think that the flatness of the hone was AS important as we make it today. Many of us have seen old barber's hones that look to have never been lapped. They have a dish in the middle you could eat out of. It got that way by honing razors. If those said razors didn't get sharp I don't think they would have been using them so much! There are arguments for narrower hones being better for giving all parts of the edge even time on the hone (preventing uneven wear) but I really think that it is a minimal change at best.
Personally I prefer narrower hones for all aspects of honing. That is just my preference based on my own technique, feel, etc. I have made due (and still do) with 8x3 Nortons in my array of hones. Some people prefer that size even. Basically I don't think any trouble comes directly from hone size- only from people lacking the skills (available to be learned here in the threads) to use any size stone with any size razor.