One thing I'm hoping to learn when I'm able to get all these razor samples analyzed is whether carbides are a helpful thing to have in a razor blade at all.
The "carbides = better edge retention" formula is carried over from the knifemaking realm. It makes sense there, because hacking through highly abrasive stuff like rope requires an edge that is toothy.
At the levels of sharpness we're considering with razors, does a steel with lots of carbides really take and hold a better edge? I'm not sure.
They do definitely make the blade harder to hone. I'm still undecided on whether the extra honing difficulty has any payoff in terms of retention of a
shaving edge.
As Russel hinted at, spheroid annealing is a bit complicated. Basically it involves heating the steel to a specific temperature and holding it there for hours or even days, then cooling veeeeeery slowly. If you do a traditional lamelar anneal with O1, for example, you get a semi-hard steel that is still pretty difficult to work. A spheroidized piece of O1 drills like butter.
Josh
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russel Baldridge
There will surely be some more in-depth responses, but the quick answer to the question about excess carbon is that it forms into carbides that are more wear resistant than plain steel. Simple carbon steel with excess carbon forms iron carbides, stain resistant steels can form chrome carbides because of the chromium content.
So more carbon is said to extend the edge holding abilities of the steel, but it makes for more complicated heat treating to dissolve the carbides.
As for spheroidizing, most steel producers offer steel in the spheroidized annealed state, but it is a process that requires pretty specific temperature controls, so most smiths do not re-spheroidize a piece of steel after work begins on it.
|